<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PhotograClare &#187; texture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photograclare.co.uk/tag/texture/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photograclare.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:37:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stairs</title>
		<link>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/stairs.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/stairs.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clare Topping</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avignon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palais des Papes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shadow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photograclare.co.uk/?p=1241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When is a lot of contrast too much contrast?  And, am I becoming obsessed with steps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.photograclare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/stairs.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1225" title="stairs" src="http://www.photograclare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/stairs.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="722" /></a>I wasn&#8217;t sure whether or not to put this on my blog.  I like the photo, I think I have developed an obsession with steps (fortunately the useful kind, not the awful pop group), but I was concerned that the top left hand corner is a little too dark.  But then, maybe the dark balances the light, I am not sure.</p>
<p>This was taken inside the Palais des Papes, on the bright, sunny Monday.  I took it using my 50mm lens, 1/160secs, f/10, ISO100 (I told you that it was sunny!) and converted it into black and white in Lightroom.</p>
<p>When I go through my photos, one of the first things that I do is check that the pictures are sharp enough that I won&#8217;t be ashamed of them.  All I do is zoom in to 1:1 and look at the picture closely.  When I did this with the picture here I actually liked the texture on the stairs and so have also included an additional crop on this post.  Although the size is about the same, I think it emphasises the textures more and is more abstract.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.photograclare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Stairs-crop.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1264" title="Stairs crop" src="http://www.photograclare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Stairs-crop-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/stairs.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Form and Texture</title>
		<link>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/form-and-texture.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/form-and-texture.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clare Topping</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botanical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macroshots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS400D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photograclare.co.uk/?p=762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Close ups of leaves can highlight a lot of detail that you would otherwise miss.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.photograclare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/hellebore.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-763" title="Texture" src="http://www.photograclare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/hellebore.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="313" /></a>I am very aware that the majority of my pictures are of insects or flowers, but there are so many of them about!  I therefore tried to take a slightly different picture last weekend when I wandered in the garden in the morning.</p>
<p>This time the picture is of part of a Hellebore leaf that had caught the morning sun.  I like this picture because of the texture, the jagged edge of the leaf and the different shades of green &#8211; there is something almost reptilian about the leaf.  It also shows how intricate so much of nature is &#8211; I am sure there is a reason for the patterns of veins on the leaf.</p>
<p>I had the camera set to shutter priority (to stop me accidentally wandering into the realms of camera shake), at 1/125secs, ISO200 and, because it was quite low light the aperture ended up at 5.0.  (Needless to say I was handholding the 400D with my 100mm macro lens.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/form-and-texture.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texture</title>
		<link>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/texture.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/texture.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clare Topping</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Botanical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macroshots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photograclare.co.uk/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes it is the smaller details, not the overall picture that can make the most interesting picture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_336" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 363px"><img class="size-full wp-image-336" title="Texture" src="http://www.photograclare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Texture1.jpg" alt="Tree Bark" width="353" height="470" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Tree Bark</p></div>
<p>I had another of those what to take moments on Boxing Day.  We went for a walk at Kedleston in Derbyshire, the sun was shining, there was still some snow on the ground, the landscape was rolling, etc etc.  I took some of the obligatory shots of the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/photograclare/4218850678/">dales</a>, and of the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/photograclare/4218547538/in/photostream/">light</a> coming through the trees, but, to me,  it did not capture the essence of a walk in the woods.</p>
<p>This picture was closer to it.  I think that the trees are individual and worth taking photos of in their own right, the leaves, the bark, even the bits left after they have fallen and are decaying with other flora and fauna making them home.  I have no idea what type of tree this is, but the sun caught the bark and made it sparkle, just as I was walking past.  The swirling patterns really caught my attention and made me stop.  My companions carried on oblivious.</p>
<p>This was snapped with my Canon Ixus, 5.8mm, f/2.8, ISO 200, 1/100 secs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photograclare.co.uk/texture.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

